Osnova sekce

  •  

     

    INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY STUDIES SEMINAR

    SUMMER SEMESTER 2024/2025

    Daniela Theinová, PhD
    Tuesday 15:50-17:20, Room 111
    Wednesday 15:50-17:20, 17:30-19:00, Room 1

    Consultation hours: in person or online, by email appointment

    Email: daniela.theinova@ff.cuni.cz

    NB: Scroll below to access reading materials and questions/assignments for each upcoming class.

    Link to the Moodle site of prof. Pilnýs Introduction to Literary Studies lecture: https://dl1.cuni.cz/course/view.php?id=12354

    OBJECTIVES
    The general aim of the seminar is to improve students’ reading and interpreting skills. Students are provided with an opportunity to test out in practice some of the knowledge gained in the lecture and to discuss the critical terms with which they were acquainted. The seminar also includes several sessions focused on the use of some basic terms of poetics in an analysis of specific poems. Formal properties of the academic essay are applied in the students’ final written projects.

    MATERIAL
    Recommended Reading:

    Aristotle, Poetics.
    Bredin, Hugh. "Comparisons and Similes". Lingua 105 (1998), 67-78.
    Bredin, Hugh. "Metonymy". Poetics Today 5, no. 1 (1984): 45-58.
    Cuddon, A.J., The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory (London: Penguin, 1992).
    Donoghue, Denis. Metaphor (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014).
    Fludernik, M., An Introduction to Narratology (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009).
    Green, K. and LeBihan, J., Critical Theory and Practice (London: Routledge, 1996).
    Herman, D., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Narrative (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
    Hobsbaum, P., Metre, Rhythm and Verse Form (Abingdon: Routledge, 1996).
    Montgomery, M., et al., Ways of Reading (London: Routledge, 1992).
    Pavis, P., Dictionary of the Theatre: Terms, Concepts, and Analysis (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998).
    Preminger, A. and Brogan, T.V.F., The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).

    Further Reading on Poetry and Poetics:

    Attridge, Derek. The Experience of Poetry: From Homer’s Listeners to Shakespeare’s Readers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
    Maxwell, Glyn. On Poetry (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).
    Lerner, Ben. The Hatred of Poetry (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2016).
    Longenbach, James. The Resistance to Poetry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
    O
    ’Donoghue, Bernard. On Poetry: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).


    Some Useful Links:

    Poetry at Harvard | Guide to Poetic Terms
    A list of terms for describing texts, with an emphasis on terms that apply specifically to poetry, that appear most frequently in literary criticism, or for which dictionary definitions tend to be unenlightening.

    Glossary | Representation Poetry Online (utoronto.ca)

    Poetry: How to Tead a Poem
    A free online course presented by the English department at the University of York, inviting readers into the wonderful world of analysing poetry.

    SYLLABUS – WINTER SEMESTER 2024/25

    WEEK 1 (1 and 2 Oct)
    Introduction, Course Outline and Requirements
    Introduction to research

    WEEK 2 (8 and 9 and Oct)
    Figurative Language 1: Metaphor, Metonymy, Synecdoche
    Definitions of the tropes, examples and discussion: Shakespeare, Shelley

    WEEK 3 (15 and 16 Oct)
    Figurative Language 2
    NO CLASSES – Written assignment (deadline and topic to be announced)

    WEEK 4 (22 and 23 Oct)
    Figurative Language 3: Irony
    Examples and discussion: Shakespeare, Swift

    WEEK 5 (29 and 30 Oct)
    Poetic Form 1: Sound Patterning: Metre and Rhythm
    Metrical form. Scansion.
    Examples and discussion: Blake, Wilson

    WEEK 6 (5 and 6 Nov)
    Poetic Form 2: Sound Patterning: Rhyme & Poems and Songs
    Purpose and effects of sound patterning and rhyme.
    Examples and discussion: Dickinson, Donne

    WEEK 7 (12 and 13 and Nov)
    Poetic Form 3: Rhythm, Rhyme  
    Examples and discussion: Keats, Hopkins, Ryan

    WEEK 8 (19 and 20 Nov)     
    NO CLASSES – Week for the Humanities 
    (
    Pick your poem and topic for the mid-term essay; start looking for secondary sources)

    WEEK 9 (26 and 27 Nov)
    Verse Forms
    Overview of verse forms.
    Examples and discussion: Bishop, D. Thomas

    WEEK 10 (3 and 4 Dec) 
    Drama and Theatre 1
    History of staging conventions, tragedy and comedy. Literary vs. dramatic text, modes and means of expression.
    Discussion of J. M. Synge’s Riders to the Sea

    WEEK 11 (10 and 11 Dec)
    Drama and Theatre II
    Modern drama and theatre.
    Discussion of Samuel Beckett’s Krapp’s Last Tape

    Please NOTE: ESSAYS must be uploaded on the course site by 23.59 on 13 December. Essays must be typed (as a WORD DOC not a PDF) and uploaded on the course Moodle site. For further instructions see below.

    WEEK 12 (17 and 18 Dec)
    Genre I
    Criteria of classification; function and use of genre.
    Discussion of Angela Carter’s “In the Company of Wolves”

    WEEK 13 (8 and 9 Jan)
    Intertextuality, Allusion, AI

    Definitions of terms
    Examples and Discussion: Muldoon, McGuckian (selected extracts)
    CONCLUSIONS: Course evaluations, essays evaluations, information on test

     

    COURSE REQUIREMENTS

    1. ATTENDANCE & PARTICIPATION
    Students are expected to attend classes. YOU ARE PERMITTED A MAXIMUM OF TWO ABSENCES.

    Participation extends beyond mere attendance. Expect your instructor to keep track of how often you contribute, particularly during the class discussions of assigned readings and/or minor written assignments.

    2. MID-TERM ESSAY (see the PDF below for Essay Guidelines)

    Select ONE of the following texts:
    W.H. Auden, “As I Walked Out One Evening”
    Elizabeth Bishop, “The Unbeliever”
    Audre Lorde, “Who Said It Was Simple”
    James Baldwin, “The Giver”

    AND address ONE of the following topics in relation to the text you have chosen:
    1. Isolate elements of metaphor, simile, metonymy and irony in the text; discuss the ways in which these elements are used to echo/articulate the themes of the text structurally.
    OR
    2. Comment on the formal features of the text (e.g., the use of metre, sound patterning, verse form, and language). How do these features shape its meaning?

    NB The minimum length for the essay is 1 500 words, the maximum length is 1550 words (THE WORD LIMIT INCLUDES THE MAIN TEXT OF THE ESSAY AND FOOTNOTES; it excludes the bibliography). Essays must include full footnotes and bibliographical references for all works cited or paraphrased (in accordance with the Notes and Bibliography Chicago Style – please consult the UALK Chicago Guidelines). Emphasis will be placed on depth and sophistication of argument, and upon the component of original research. Students are advised not to use Internet sources in place of adequately researching texts available in print or via the Charles University eResources Portal (UKAŽ). Essays must be presented with attention to correct spelling and stylistics. The recommended number of secondary sources is four to five. These must include at least one monograph or collection of essays (published in a book form) on a relevant theme. Plagiarism will not be tolerated and will result in a fail grade. The use of generative AI for this assignment is prohibited.

    The deadline for the submission of essays is 23:59 13 December 2024. Essays must be typed in WORD format (NO PDFs) and uploaded on the course Moodle site. Contact me by e-mail (prior to the deadline) if you encounter difficulties uploading your paper.

    Extensions will only be granted on the basis of a consultation or written request accompanied by a doctor’s certificate. Students are advised that they may, at the lecturer’s discretion, be given the option of re-submission where essays have failed to achieve a satisfactory standard of argumentation. However, any rewrites must be submitted (by email or on the course site) by 18 January 2025.

    3. FINAL TEST (only for single-subject students; details and dates tba; the test takes place during the winter exam period)

     

    ASSESSMENT

    Double-subject Students
    WS (zápočet): Attendance (max. 2 unexplained absences) and active participation in class, mid-term essay: interpretation of poetry (1 500 words).
    SS (zápočet): Attendance (max. 2 unexplained absences) and active participation in class, mid-term essay: narrative analysis (1 500 words).
    Criteria of Assessment: All assignments will be awarded a letter grade. Credit (zápočet) for each semester will be given on the basis of receiving a pass grade (i.e., A to C-) for both essay and participation.

    Single-subject Students:
    WS (zápočet): Attendance (max. 2 unexplained absences) and active participation in class, mid-term essay: interpretation of poetry (1 500 words), final test on poetics and genre definitions.
    SS (zápočet, zkouška): Attendance (max. 2 unexplained absences) and active participation in class, mid-term essay: narrative analysis (1 500 words), final test on narrative strategies and approaches to text (literary theories).
    Criteria of Assessment: All assignments will be awarded a letter grade. Credit (zápočet) for each semester will be given on the basis of receiving a pass grade (i.e., A to C-) for essay, test and participation each. The final exam grade (after the summer semester) will be calculated from the results in the individual assignments.

    Composition of Final Exam Grade for Single Subject Students

    Participation winter semester

    10%

    Participation summer semester

    10%

    Essay winter semester

    25%

    Essay summer semester

    25%

    Test winter semester

    15%

    Test summer semester

    15%

    Value of Individual Letter Grades Awarded for Assignments

     

    10%

    15%

    25%

    A

    10

    15

    25

    A-

    9

    13.5

    22.5

    B+

    8.7

    13

    21.75

    B

    8.5

    12.75

    21.25

    B-

    8

    12

    20

    C+

    7.7

    11.5

    19.25

    C

    7.5

    11.25

    18.75

    C-

    7

    10.5

    17.5

     

    Conversion of Grades to a Final FFUK Exam Grade

    FFUK Grade

    Letter Grade

    Percent (%)

    Generally Accepted Meaning

    1

          A

    96-100

    Outstanding work

          A-

    90-95

    2

          B+

    87-89

    Good work, distinctly above average

          B

    83-86

          B-

    80-82

    3

          C+

    77-79

    Acceptable work

          C

    73-76

          C-

    70-72

    F

          F

    0-69

    Work that does not meet minimum standards for passing the course

     

     

    Example:

    A student’s performance has been graded as follows:

    Participation winter semester                                      A-               = 9

    Participation summer semester                                  B                 = 8.5

    Essay winter semester                                                    A-               = 22.5

    Essay summer semester                                                 C                 = 18.75

    Test winter semester                                                       C                 = 11.25

    Test summer semester                                                   B                 = 12.75

    The final exam grade is                                                  2 (B-)        = 82.75%

     

     

  • INTRODUCTION TO READING

    Wooden Writing Tablets, Wood and wax, Coptic Cunk on... - BBC iPlayer

    Wooden Writing Tablets; 500-700; Byzantine Egypt; The Met, New York.
    Philomena Cunk 
    (Interview with Rich Pelley, The Guardian28 Sept 2024)

    RP: Should they continue to teach reading at school or is it pointless in later life, like maths?
    PC: I think you should stop teaching reading at the point that a child is able to read. Otherwise the child will find it a bit patronising.

    Discussion Questions:

    What are the beneficial aspects of reading? Does it have any ethical significance? Are there any ethical drawbacks/risks involved in creating and reading, in producing and consuming literature?

    Some links:

    Jiří Trávníček, Kulturní vetřelec: Dějiny čtení – kalendárium (Praha: Host, 2020).
    Matthew Garrett, "Ethics of Reading", Oxford Encyclopedia of Literary Theory (Oxford Univeristy Press: Oxford Encyclopedia of Literary Theory, 2020).

  • WHAT IS POETRY?

    FOUR BASIC TROPES: METAPHOR, SIMILE, METONYMY, SYNECDOCHE

    Ted Cohen: "Metaphor is the achievement of intimacy [between writer/text and reader]."

    Assignment for WEEK 2

    For discussion:

    • Think (and prepare written notes) about how you would define POETRY. What are its derining qualities? What distinguishes it from other genres? Are there differences between how poetry is written and read today and how it was composed and experienced in the past? Note down 2 things that you think poetry is not or does not do.
    • Read the two poems on Moodle (Shakespeare and Shelley) and make yourselves familiar with their language and contents. Print the poems out or download them to be able to make notes prior to and in the class.

    Writing:

    • Consult three reputable sources and compose definitions of the terms METAPHOR, METONYMY, SYNECDOCHE and SIMILE, using footnotes to reference your sources. Include a bibliography at the end. The individual definitions should be concise but written in academic prose using complete sentences (not bullet points etc.).

    o   Are there any significant differences between the definitions of the individual terms you have found?

    o   Your sources should be print, NOT websites or standard (language) dictionaries (dictionaries of literary terms are fine).

    o   Try to use your own words as much as you can but include at least three paraphrases and three citations with the sources referenced in the footnotes. Remember that all quotations and paraphrases must be identified in the text”

    - use quotation marks for direct quotations

    - embed (introduce) your quotations AND paraphrases by relevant introductory tags (as XY argues; writes XY; to use  XY’s terms etc.)

    - include properly formatted references to your sources in the FOOTNOTES (and in the BIBLIOGRAPHY section at the end)

    o   All sources on which your definitions draw must be listed (in the footnotes and bibliography sections). Consult the “UALK Chicago Guidelines” to properly format your footnotes and bibliography.

    o   One short paragraph per term should suffice (approx. 50 to 120 words). Try to be concise and concentrate on the formal aspects of your writing as well as the contents.

    o   Use the ‘References/Footnotes’ tab to insert your footnotes in your text.

    Do not submit your definitions beforehand. We will discuss them IN CLASS.

     

    Some links (optional): 

    • Please note that the homework/assignment for this week (Week 2) will not be collected until later. Prepare your definitions and try to locate the sources but there is no need to submit them at this point.

    • Some sources on poetry, mentioned in the discussions this week:

      • Derek Attridge, The Craft of Poetry: Dialogues on Minimal Interpretation (with Henry Staten)
      • John Ciardi, How Does a Poem Mean?
      • Jonathan Culler, Theory of the Lyric
      • Vona Groarke, Four Sides Full
      • Ben Lerner, The Hatred of Poetry
      • James Longenbach, The Lyric Now
      • Glyn Maxwell, On Poetry & Drinks with Dead Poets: The Autumn Terms
      • The New Yorker Fiction Podcast: Teju Cole Reads Anne Carson (with December 1, 2023

    • In Poetry: A Very Short Introduction, Bernard O’Donoghue, notes that most theories of poetry (and art as such) in the Western tradition have evolved around the basic distinction between ‘the idea of poetry [...] as either imitative, or transcendent: either imitating lie or reality of nature, or surpassing those things in a way that somehow compensates for their deficiencies’.[1] Other ongoing arguments include the question about which is more important: the sense or the sound of poetry – its semantic or its sonic/material qualities. This is related to the idea that poetry either leads us to deeper knowledge of the world (or self-knowledge), or that it is concerned with providing aesthetic pleasure. Yet another distinction is found in the contrast between Shelley’s famous claim that ‘poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world’,[2] and W. H. Auden’s counterclaim that ‘poetry makes nothing happen’.[3] The latter idea is supported by James Longenbach’s argument that ‘the marginality of poetry is in many ways the source of its power, a power contingent on poetry’s capacity to resist itself more strenuously than it is resisted by the culture at large’.[4] Many conceptions of poetry and its role (answers to the questions of ‘What poetry is’ and ‘What it is for’), as you can see below, focus on its universality (despite its marginal status in most modern cultures), or on the importance of language and sound for the way poetry communicates its meaning.

      FEEL FREE TO KEEP ADDING TO THIS BANK OF IDEAS ON POETRY – its possibilities as well as limitations!

      [Poetry is] the first light-giver to ignorance. — Philip Sidney

      Poetry is a sword of lightning, ever unsheathed, which consumes the scabbard that would contain it. —Percy Bysshe Shelley

      If I read a book and it makes my whole body so cold no fire can ever warm me, I know that is poetry. – Emily Dickinson

      Poets fear wisdom. — James Longenbach

      Poetry is my deepest health. — Sylvia Plath

      Poems are moments’ monuments. — Sylvia Plath

      A poem is never finished, only abandoned. — Paul Valéry

      Poetry is just the evidence of life. If your life is burning well, poetry is just the ash. — Leonard Cohen.

      Poetry is when an emotion has found its thought, and the thought has found words. — Robert Frost

      [Lyric as a form] stands or falls on the accuracy of language with which it reports the author’s emotional responses to the life around him. — Helen Vendler

      Genuine poetry can communicate before it is understood. — T. S. Eliot

      I would define, in brief, the poetry of words, as the rhythmical creation of beauty. — Edgar Allan Poe

      Poetry is a composition of words set to music. Most other definitions of it are indefensible or metaphysical. — E. A. Poe

      The poem: a prolonged hesitation between sound and sense. — Paul Valéry

      Poet is the One Who, on Behalf of Others and for their Benefit, Maintains a Friendship with Language. — Petr Borkovec

      Poetry is words. — A. C. Bradley

      Poetry is language at its most distilled and most powerful. — Rita Dove

      A poet is, before anything else, a person who is passionately in love with language. — W. H. Auden

      Poetry is the form of supreme locution in any culture. — Joseph Brodsky

      [P]oetry is the universal possession of mankind, revealing itself everywhere and at all times in hundreds and hundreds of men. [...] National literature is now an unmeaning terms; the epoch of world literature is at hand. — J. W. Goethe

       



      [1] Bernard O’Donoghue, Poetry: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), 3.

      [2] Percy Bysshe Shelley. A Defence of Poetry and Other Essays, 1821, Project Gutenberg (April 2004) accessed October 10 2024, https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/9097.

      [3] W. H. Auden, ‘In Memory of W. B. Yeats’, in The English Auden: Poems, Essays, and Dramatic Writings 1927–1939, ed. Edward Mendelson (London: Faber, 1977), 242. Auden’s phrase is one of the most disputed statements about poetry in twentieth-century criticism. For a concise summary of the debate, see John Lyon, ‘Disappearing Poetry: Auden, Yeats, Empson’, in The Oxford Hanbook of British and Irish War Poetry, ed. Tim Kendall (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 279–85.

      [4] James Longenbach, The Resistance to Poetry (London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 1.

  • Though the classes this week have been cancelled, you are asked to submit by Wednesday night (via Moodle):

    1. your Assignment for Week 2 (the definitions of tropes)

    2. Also, I am asking you to go back to Shakespeare's Sonnet 60 and Shelley's "Ozymandias" and identify in each of them (if possible):

    1 simile
    3 metaphors 
    2 metonyms
    2 synecdoches

    Make sure you explain your choices, using terminologies and key words you've included in your definitions; see also the Handout for Week 2 and your lecture notes. It should be clear from your explanation why the particular phrase or word works as the trope of your choice in the context of the poem or its relevant part/image.

    You can include your answers as scans of the poems with your handwritten notes, or type your answers on both poems in the file containing your definitions.

    You'll get feedback on the definitions by email and we'll discuss your analyses of the poems in Week 4 of the semester.

  • We will meet this week, despite it being the Dean's Sports Day on 22 October.

    Assignment for WEEK 4:

    IRONY

    Term definition:

    • With reference to at least two scholarly sources, define irony, focussing on the following questions:
      Q: What work does irony do, what effects does it create?
      Q: What are some of the types of irony and why is it useful to distinguish between them?

    N.B.: This is NOT part of the homework for Week 2/3 (definitions of tropes). Definitions of irony will be reviewed in class; make notes but you are not asked to send them beforehand.

    Reading & Questions for Discussion:

    • Read Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130 and Swift’s 'A Modest Proposal'. Both use irony as a key device. 
      Q: Identify specific forms of irony used by both authors.
      Q: Evaluate the use of irony in each – what impact does it have on you as a reader? How does irony work to develop the central theme of each text??
      Q: Imagine what would be lost or gained if irony were not a feature in either of the text.
    • BRING Shelley’s “Ozymandias” and Shakespeare’s Sonnet 60 to the class – we will discuss your identification of the 4 tropes in the two poems (See assignment for Week 3).