After my reading, I would say that the prologue and the “dream vision” act together. The prologue is indeed more generic, with an universal goal, while the “dream vision” uses an individual case. That said, for me, the dream is not meant to tell the story of one particular character: with its strong spiritual meaning, it is more a way of exploring human desires/passions/inner debates. In both parts, Gower chooses to talk about love, as he shows that it is the most violent of human feelings. No one can resist love. And love is also the center of the harmony of the world, as it is emphasized in the prologue. However, even if love is a beautiful emotion that allows mankind to live together, the writer insists on a more moral aspect. Good behaviors, good thoughts, are necessary. Human’s love has to fit with God’s love. It is illustrated by the presence of Father Genius, who, thanks to the confession, will allow the character to get rid of his disorder, in a way to find a more moral love, with a stronger spiritual than physical dimension.
I would also say that I am curious to know if there is some hidden message in the prologue. For me, the prologue started with the description and regrets of a bygone era, when the world was in order. It was characterized by no vice, many values, noble love. Then, it switched to a world of disorder, chaos, war. Gower blames the bad advice that the rulers can get. Finally, he hopes or prays for an order of the World closer to God's will. I was just wondering if there could be some critics of the writer’s world at the time. With a strong moral dimension, this prologue could maybe be a way of blaming others for their attitudes. But maybe I am going a bit too far and this construction is just a reflection on the state of the world in general, and is not aimed at any particular human community.