A Conceptual Metaphor approach to war discourse and its implications
Published 2007
4846 ViewsPaperRank: 2.4270 Pages
2 Files ▾
 (PDF) A Conceptual Metaphor approach to war discourse and its implications _ Malgorzata Fabiszak - Academia.edu_files/paper-load-1b031d9533a8820bb7d29c480b61dbfd9e64bd463227425ff853db1b61208541.gif)
Loading Preview
scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd. scribd.
Contents
Acknowledgements
..................................................................................5
Style conventions
.....................................................................................7
Introduction
............................................................................................ 9
Chapter I.
Conceptual metaphor and its implications for discourse .... 15
1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 152. Conceptual Metaphor Theory ...................................................................... 172.1. The early formulation .......................................................................... 172.2. Further development of CMT .............................................................. 192.3. The criticism of Conceptual Metaphor Theory .................................... 232.4. Generic metaphors and the Great Chain of Being ............................... 262.5. Metaphor from a functional perspective .............................................. 282.6. Linguistic and conceptual metaphor – a terminological problem ............................................................................................... 292.7. Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Discourse Analysis ....................... 322.8.The systemization of metaphors ........................................................... 363. Idealized Cognitive Models ......................................................................... 374. Image schemata ............................................................................................ 395. Force dynamics ............................................................................................ 416. Blending Theory .......................................................................................... 437. Axiological semantics .................................................................................. 498. A summary of the chapter and an outline for the analysis ........................... 50
Chapter II.
Corpus linguistics and the language of mass media ......... 53
1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 532. The beginnings of language corpora ............................................................ 543. Word meaning and the corpus ..................................................................... 554. The language of the mass media, discourse analysis and metaphor ............ 665. Conclusion ................................................................................................... 73
Contents
2
Chapter III.
The concept of ‘war’ in the humanities ........................... 75
1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 752. Clausewitz and Jomini on war ..................................................................... 753. Philosophy and the concept of ‘war’ ............................................................ 784. Social studies and the concept of ‘war’ ....................................................... 855. Literature and war ....................................................................................... 916. War correspondents ..................................................................................... 987. Linguistics and war .................................................................................... 1028. Summary of the chapter ............................................................................. 109
Chapter IV.
A qualitative analysis of war news .................................. 111
1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 1112. Analysis of data ......................................................................................... 1122.1. Trybuna Ludu on the Falklands war (1982) ...................................... 1122.1.1. Paragraph-structuring metaphors ............................................... 1132.1.2. Isolated metaphors ..................................................................... 1142.1.3. Other rhetorical strategies .......................................................... 1202.2. The Times on the Falklands war (1982) ............................................ 1222.2.1. Isolated metaphors ..................................................................... 1232.2.2. Other rhetorical strategies .......................................................... 1342.3. Trybuna Ludu on the American air raids on Libya (1986) .................1352.3.1. Paragraph-structuring metaphors ................................................1352.3.2. Isolated metaphors .................................................................... 1392.3.3. Other rhetorical strategies .......................................................... 1452.4. Rzeczpospolita on the American air raids on Libya (1986) ............... 1492.4.1. Isolated metaphors ..................................................................... 1492.5. The Times on the American air raids on Libya (1986) ...................... 1522.5.1. Paragraph-structuring metaphors ............................................... 1532.5.2. Isolated metaphors ..................................................................... 1562.5.3. Other rhetorical strategies .......................................................... 1592.6. Trybuna Ludu on the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan(1988-1989) ....................................................................................... 1602.6.1. Paragraph-structuring metaphor ................................................ 1612.6.2. Isolated metaphors ..................................................................... 1612.6.3. Other rhetorical strategies .......................................................... 1632.7. Rzeczpospolita on the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan(1988-1989) ....................................................................................... 163
Contents
32.8. The Times on the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan(1988-1989) ....................................................................................... 1652.8.1. Paragraph-structuring metaphors ............................................... 1652.8.2. Isolated metaphors ..................................................................... 1662.8.3. Other rhetorical strategies .......................................................... 1692.9. Trybuna on the war on terror ............................................................. 1772.9.1. Isolated metaphors ..................................................................... 1772.9.2. Other rhetorical strategies .......................................................... 1802.10. The Times on the war on terror ....................................................... 1812.10.1. Paragraph-structuring metaphors ............................................. 1812.10.2. Isolated metaphors ................................................................... 1833. A summary of the qualitative analysis of war reports ................................ 188
Chapter V.
Words from the lexical field of war and their metaphoric potential. A corpus-based analysis ...................................................... 195
1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 1952. The data ...................................................................................................... 1983. The British National Corpus ...................................................................... 2034. The Pragglejaz Procedure .......................................................................... 2045. The analysis of concordance lines: Frequency of literal and metaphoricaluses ........................................................................................................... 2085.1. ATTACK ........................................................................................... 2085.2. BOMB ................................................................................................ 2105.3. CONFLICT ........................................................................................ 2145.4. DEFEND ............................................................................................ 2155.5. FIGHT ................................................................................................ 2195.6. INVADE ............................................................................................ 2225.7. SURRENDER .................................................................................... 2256. Summary of the results and conclusion ..................................................... 227
Conclusion
.......................................................................................... 231
Appendix 1
......................................................................................... 237
Appendix 2
.. ....................................................................................... 241
Index of conceptual metaphors and metonimies
............................ 247
Index of authors
................................................................................. 249
References
.......................................................................................... 253
Streszczenie [Summary in Polish]
..................................................... 267
Acknowledgements
This book has benefited greatly from the discussions I had with many peo- ple. I would like to extend my gratitude to Prof. Aleksander Szwedek andProf. Kamila Turewicz, who have read and commented on several drafts of this book at different stages of its composition. They helped me to clarifythe theoretical underpinnings of the work and to curb my fas-cination withthe data. Prof. Andreas Musolff and Dr. Veronika Koller have read Chapter Four and suggested several improvements. Dr. Adam G
ł
az and Dr. Prze-mys
ł
aw Kaszubski commented on the whole text adding to its cohesion andstructural precision. Collin Philips has proofread and given me stylistic ad-vice on language. Micha
ł
Jankowski and Ewa Kowalkowska have sharedtheir expertise in editing the book. I thank them all.The research for this book has been supported by a two-year grantfrom the Rector of Adam Mickiewicz University in Pozna
ń
.Last but not least I would like to thank my children, Natalia andMaciej, for their patience and understanding when Mum’s work took precedence over their needs. I also appreciate the unfailing emotional andintellectual support of my husband Jacek Fabiszak.I dedicate this book to my Mother who sparked my interest in lan-guage and to my Father who has given me example of perseverance inacademic career.
Style conventions
‘Concepts’ are marked with single quotation marks ‘’, e.g. ‘war’ and‘peace’ are important concepts in any political theory.D
OMAINS
, as understood within Conceptual Metaphor Theory arewritten in
SMALL CAPS
, e.g. the most important elements in the domain of
WAR
are the opponents and the conflict obtaining between them.C
ONCEPTUAL
M
ETAPHORS
, like domains are given in
SMALL CAPS
,e.g.
NATION
/
STATE IS A PERSON
.Conceptual Mappings obtaining between the source and targetdomains are Capitalised, e.g. Stages of War are Acts of a Play.Examples from the corpora are given in
italics.
Key words in the examples are
underlined
.Translations of Polish examples into English are given in singlequotation marks, e.g.
wojna
‘war’.
 (PDF) A Conceptual Metaphor approach to war discourse and its implications _ Malgorzata Fabiszak - Academia.edu_files/7-686e2ed3f0.jpg)
Introduction
The classical European approach to war is based on Clausewitz’s famoussaying that
War is a mere continuation of policy by other means
(1873:Book I, Chapter 1, part 24). Such a framing of war emphasizes its com- plex relation to politics. Historians and sociologists often see wars assources of social change. Hassner, a contemporary philosopher and inter-national relations expert, views war today as a dialectic conflict between bourgeois and barbarian, the conflict between Jominian idea of techno-logical advantage and terrorism. Hassner believes that bourgeois is bestrepresented by the American society and its war strategy, imbued with thehuman rights ideas, aimed at minimising self-losses, civilian losses andeven the enemy losses. To achieve this aim they employ Rapid DecisiveOperations strategy which is possible because of significant technologicaland information advantage. The barbarian, now equalled with the Muslimextremists, not having such an advantage, must turn to terrorism. Hassner also notices less spectacular exigencies of war, that is the necessity totrespass the taboo of taking another human life. The taboo creates an in-herent conflict between the heroic myth of war and the necessity of kill-ing other human beings resulting in the rhetoric of enemy vilification.The contemporary understanding of war is heavily influenced byits media representation. This book analyses the discursive strategies usedin the press war reports cross culturally and across the time span of 20years. The primary focus is on the role of conceptual metaphors in thesediscursive construals.Discourse analysis is understood in terms following van Dijk’s(1997) characterisation of the discipline as a field combining an analysisof the interplay between cognition, language and social interaction.Within this framework, discourse analysis may refer to either talk or textanalysis and differs in this respect from de Beaugrande – Dressler’s(1981) distinction between the two. The present book concentrates on thewritten language, in particular on linguistic realisations of underlyingconceptual metaphors in journalistic discourse. Language use is explainedin terms of cognitive processes, i.e. conceptual metaphors. This language
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.