Перейти к основному содержанию
Боковая панель
DL 1
В начало
More
Русский (ru)
Čeština (cs)
Deutsch (de)
English (en)
Français (fr)
Русский (ru)
Вы используете гостевой доступ
Вход
В начало
Open course index
В начало
Курсы
Empirické metody v gramatické analýze (ABO500999)
16. 2. 2021
Arunachalam, S. (2013) Experimental methods in linguistics
Arunachalam, S. (2013) Experimental methods in linguistics
Нажмите на ссылку
Arunachalam, S. (2013) Experimental methods in linguistics
, чтобы открыть ресурс.
◄ Dabrowska, E. (2010): Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review, 27, s. 1–23.
Перейти на...
Перейти на...
Oznámení
Chromý, J. (2014): Práce s empirickými daty. Praha: Karolinum.
Zdroje k experimentu 1
Zdroje k experimentu 2
Chaves, Rui P. & Mike Putnam. 2020. Unbounded Dependency Constructions: theoretical and experimental perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Experimentální podněty - Exp 1
Experimentální podněty - Exp 2
Výplňky
Textové elementy do experimentu
Evidence počtu účastníků
Preregistrace
Předběžné výsledky (11. 5.)
Prezentace 16. 2.
Dabrowska, E. (2010): Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review, 27, s. 1–23.
Sprouse & Hornstein (2013): Experimental syntax and island effects
Wh-movement (Wikipedia)
Prezentace 2. 3.
Jegerski, J. (2014): Self-paced reading. In: J. Jegerski – B. VanPatten (eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics. New York – London: Routledge, s. 20–49.
Otázky k textu Jegerski
Lešnerová, Š. & Oliva, K. (2003). Česká vztažná souvětí s nestandardní strukturou. Slovo a slovesnost 64(4), 241-252.
Biskup, P. & Šimík, R. (2019). Structure of conditional and (cor)relative clauses: New evidence from locality. In Baird, M. & Pesetsky, J. (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 49, vol. 1, s. 135-144. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Prezentace 9. 3.
Chromý, J. 2020. The type of garden-path matters: When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences. Under revision for Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Otázky k textu Chromý
Prezentace 16. 3.
Rayner, K. et al. (2006): Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), s. 241–255.
Sem odevzdávejte údaje k měřítkům očních pohybů z výzkumu Rayner et al. (v pdf) - DO PONDĚLÍ 22. 3. 13:00
Bonus: The Ling Space on garden paths (video)
Prezentace 23. 3.
Traxler, M. J. & Pickering, M. J. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 35(3), 454-475
Bonus: The Ling Space on eye-tracking (video)
Otázky k Traxler & Pickering 1996
Prezentace 30. 3.
Berends, S. et al. (2016): Eye-tracking and the Visual World Paradigm. In: Schmid, M. et al. (eds.), Designing Research on Bilingual Developments. Behavioral and Neurolinguistic Experiments. Heidelberg: Springer, s. 55–80.
Záznam druhé půlky semináře
Otázky k Berends et al. 2016
Prezentace 6. 4.
Contemori, C. et al. (2018). On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: A visual world paradigm study. Journal of Child Languge 45(2), 415-441.
Otázky k textu Contemori et al. 2018
Prezentace 13. 4.
Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, K. (2005): Notional number agreement in English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), s. 689–695.
Otázky k textu Humphreys & Bock 2005
Prezentace 20. 4.
Šimík, R. & Demian, C. (to appear). Uniqueness and maximality in German and Polish: A production experiment. In Dočekal, M. & Wągiel, M. (eds.), Formal approaches to number in Slavic and beyond. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Otázky k textu Šimík & Demian
Prezentace 27. 4.
Experimentální software L-Rex
Boxplot na české wikipedii
Understanding boxplots
Prezentace 08
Mirault, J. et al. (2018): You That Read Wrong Again! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments.
Bermel, N., & Knittl, L. (2012): Corpus frequency and acceptability judgments: A study of morphosyntactic variants in Czech
VanPatten, B. et al. (2012): Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem
Stewart, A. J. et al. (2009): Early sensitivity to discourse-level anomalies: Evidence from self-paced reading
Sanford, A. J., & Filik, R. (2007). “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost
Liversedge, S. et al. (2003) - Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment
Altmann, G. T. . – Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference
Tanenhaus, M. K. et al. (1995): Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension
Von Stutterheim, C. (2009): New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages
Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, K. (2005). Notional number agreement in English
Branigan, H. P. et al. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue
Sprouse & Hornstein (2013): Experimental syntax and island effects ►