Skip to main content
Side panel
DL 1
Home
Support
User support
GDPR
More
English (en)
Čeština (cs)
Deutsch (de)
English (en)
Français (fr)
Русский (ru)
You are currently using guest access
Log in
Home
Support
Collapse
Expand
User support
GDPR
Open course index
Home
Courses
Faculty of Arts
Institute of Czech Language and Theory of Communication
Empirické metody v gramatické analýze (ABO500999)
STARÉ - NABÍDKA STUDIÍ PRO REPLIKACI
Prezentace 08
Prezentace 08
Click on
Prezentace 08
to open the resource.
◄ Understanding boxplots
Jump to...
Jump to...
Oznámení
Chromý, J. (2014): Práce s empirickými daty. Praha: Karolinum.
Zdroje k experimentu 1
Zdroje k experimentu 2
Chaves, Rui P. & Mike Putnam. 2020. Unbounded Dependency Constructions: theoretical and experimental perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Experimentální podněty - Exp 1
Experimentální podněty - Exp 2
Výplňky
Textové elementy do experimentu
Evidence počtu účastníků
Preregistrace
Předběžné výsledky (11. 5.)
Prezentace 16. 2.
Dabrowska, E. (2010): Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review, 27, s. 1–23.
Arunachalam, S. (2013) Experimental methods in linguistics
Sprouse & Hornstein (2013): Experimental syntax and island effects
Wh-movement (Wikipedia)
Prezentace 2. 3.
Jegerski, J. (2014): Self-paced reading. In: J. Jegerski – B. VanPatten (eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics. New York – London: Routledge, s. 20–49.
Otázky k textu Jegerski
Lešnerová, Š. & Oliva, K. (2003). Česká vztažná souvětí s nestandardní strukturou. Slovo a slovesnost 64(4), 241-252.
Biskup, P. & Šimík, R. (2019). Structure of conditional and (cor)relative clauses: New evidence from locality. In Baird, M. & Pesetsky, J. (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 49, vol. 1, s. 135-144. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Prezentace 9. 3.
Chromý, J. 2020. The type of garden-path matters: When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences. Under revision for Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Otázky k textu Chromý
Prezentace 16. 3.
Rayner, K. et al. (2006): Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), s. 241–255.
Sem odevzdávejte údaje k měřítkům očních pohybů z výzkumu Rayner et al. (v pdf) - DO PONDĚLÍ 22. 3. 13:00
Bonus: The Ling Space on garden paths (video)
Prezentace 23. 3.
Traxler, M. J. & Pickering, M. J. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 35(3), 454-475
Bonus: The Ling Space on eye-tracking (video)
Otázky k Traxler & Pickering 1996
Prezentace 30. 3.
Berends, S. et al. (2016): Eye-tracking and the Visual World Paradigm. In: Schmid, M. et al. (eds.), Designing Research on Bilingual Developments. Behavioral and Neurolinguistic Experiments. Heidelberg: Springer, s. 55–80.
Záznam druhé půlky semináře
Otázky k Berends et al. 2016
Prezentace 6. 4.
Contemori, C. et al. (2018). On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: A visual world paradigm study. Journal of Child Languge 45(2), 415-441.
Otázky k textu Contemori et al. 2018
Prezentace 13. 4.
Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, K. (2005): Notional number agreement in English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), s. 689–695.
Otázky k textu Humphreys & Bock 2005
Prezentace 20. 4.
Šimík, R. & Demian, C. (to appear). Uniqueness and maximality in German and Polish: A production experiment. In Dočekal, M. & Wągiel, M. (eds.), Formal approaches to number in Slavic and beyond. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Otázky k textu Šimík & Demian
Prezentace 27. 4.
Experimentální software L-Rex
Boxplot na české wikipedii
Understanding boxplots
Mirault, J. et al. (2018): You That Read Wrong Again! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments.
Bermel, N., & Knittl, L. (2012): Corpus frequency and acceptability judgments: A study of morphosyntactic variants in Czech
VanPatten, B. et al. (2012): Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem
Stewart, A. J. et al. (2009): Early sensitivity to discourse-level anomalies: Evidence from self-paced reading
Sanford, A. J., & Filik, R. (2007). “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost
Liversedge, S. et al. (2003) - Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment
Altmann, G. T. . – Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference
Tanenhaus, M. K. et al. (1995): Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension
Von Stutterheim, C. (2009): New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages
Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, K. (2005). Notional number agreement in English
Branigan, H. P. et al. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue
Mirault, J. et al. (2018): You That Read Wrong Again! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments. ►